Lang, R. M. et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 28, 1–39.e14 (2015).
Google Scholar
Thorstensen, A., Dalen, H., Amundsen, B. H., Aase, S. A. & Stoylen, A. Reproducibility in echocardiographic assessment of the left ventricular global and regional function, the HUNT study. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 11, 149–156 (2010).
Google Scholar
Nagueh, S. F. et al. Interobserver variability in applying American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging 2016 guidelines for estimation of left ventricular filling pressure. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 12, e008122 (2019).
Google Scholar
Won, D. et al. Sound the alarm: the sonographer shortage is echoing across healthcare. J. Ultrasound Med. 43, 1289–1301 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hanneman, K. et al. Value creation through artificial intelligence and cardiovascular imaging: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 149, e296–e311 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jordan, M. I. & Mitchell, T. M. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349, 255–260 (2015).
Google Scholar
Carneiro, G., Nascimento, J. C. & Freitas, A. The segmentation of the left ventricle of the heart from ultrasound data using deep learning architectures and derivative-based search methods. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 21, 968–982 (2012).
Google Scholar
Abdi, A. H. et al. Automatic quality assessment of echocardiograms using convolutional neural networks: feasibility on the apical four-chamber view. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 36, 1221–1230 (2017).
Google Scholar
Madani, A., Arnaout, R., Mofrad, M. & Arnaout, R. Fast and accurate view classification of echocardiograms using deep learning. npj Digit. Med. 1, 6 (2018).
Google Scholar
Østvik, A., Smistad, E., Aase, S. A., Haugen, B. O. & Lovstakken, L. Real-time standard view classification in transthoracic echocardiography using convolutional neural networks. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 45, 374–384 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhang, J. et al. Fully automated echocardiogram interpretation in clinical practice. Circulation 138, 1623–1635 (2018).
Google Scholar
Siontis, K. C., Noseworthy, P. A., Attia, Z. I. & Friedman, P. A. Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography in cardiovascular disease management. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 18, 465–478 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tromp, J. et al. Automated interpretation of systolic and diastolic function on the echocardiogram: a multicohort study. Lancet Digit. Health 4, e46–e54 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hirata, Y., Nomura, Y., Saijo, Y., Sata, M. & Kusunose, K. Reducing echocardiographic examination time through routine use of fully automated software: a comparative study of measurement and report creation time. J. Echocardiogr. 22, 162–170 (2024).
Google Scholar
Olaisen, S. et al. Automatic measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by artificial intelligence: clinical validation in real time and large databases. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 25, 383–395 (2024).
Google Scholar
Krittanawong, C. et al. Deep learning for echocardiography: introduction for clinicians and future vision: state-of-the-art review. Life 13, 1029 (2023).
Google Scholar
Ostvik, A. et al. Myocardial function imaging in echocardiography using deep learning. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 40, 1340–1351 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tromp, J. et al. A formal validation of a deep learning-based automated workflow for the interpretation of the echocardiogram. Nat. Commun. 13, 6776 (2022).
Google Scholar
Myhre, P. L. et al. External validation of a deep learning algorithm for automated echocardiographic strain measurements. Eur. Heart J. Digit. Health 5, 60–68 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cai, Q. et al. Automated echocardiographic diastolic function grading: a hybrid multi-task deep learning and machine learning approach. Int. J. Cardiol. 416, 132504 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, B. et al. Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment. Nature 616, 520–524 (2023).
Google Scholar
Balagopalan, A. et al. Machine learning for healthcare that matters: reorienting from technical novelty to equitable impact. PLoS Digit. Health 3, e0000474 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ouyang, D. et al. Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function. Nature 580, 252–256 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kusunose, K. et al. A deep learning approach for assessment of regional wall motion abnormality from echocardiographic images. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 13, 374–381 (2020).
Google Scholar
Asch, F. M. et al. Automated echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction without volume measurements using a machine learning algorithm mimicking a human expert. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 12, e009303 (2019).
Google Scholar
Asch, F. M. et al. Deep learning-based automated echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular ejection fraction: a point-of-care solution. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, e012293 (2021).
Google Scholar
Myhre, P. L. et al. Concordance of left ventricular volumes and function measurements between two human readers, a fully automated AI algorithm, and the 3D heart model. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 11, 1400333 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lang, R. M. et al. Use of machine learning to improve echocardiographic image interpretation workflow: a disruptive paradigm change? J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 34, 443–445 (2021).
Google Scholar
Leclerc, S. et al. Deep learning for segmentation using an open large-scale dataset in 2D echocardiography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 2198–2210 (2019).
Google Scholar
Smistad, E. et al. Real-time automatic ejection fraction and foreshortening detection using deep learning. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 67, 2595–2604 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ghorbani, A. et al. Deep learning interpretation of echocardiograms. npj Digit. Med. 3, 10 (2020).
Google Scholar
Alvén, J., Hagberg, E., Hagerman, D., Petersen, R. & Hjelmgren, O. A deep multi-stream model for robust prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction in 2D echocardiography. Sci. Rep. 14, 2104 (2024).
Google Scholar
Salte, I. M. et al. Artificial intelligence for automatic measurement of left ventricular strain in echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, 1918–1928 (2021).
Google Scholar
Salte, I. M. et al. Deep learning for improved precision and reproducibility of left ventricular strain in echocardiography: a test–retest study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 36, 788–799 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nyberg, J. et al. Deep learning improves test-retest reproducibility of regional strain in echocardiography. Eur. Heart J. Imaging Methods Pract. 2, qyae092 (2024).
Google Scholar
Stowell, C. C. et al. 2-dimensional echocardiographic global longitudinal strain with artificial intelligence using open data from a UK-wide collaborative. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 17, 865–876 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kwan, A. C. et al. Deep learning-derived myocardial strain. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 17, 715–725 (2024).
Google Scholar
Schneider, M. et al. A machine learning algorithm supports ultrasound-naïve novices in the acquisition of diagnostic echocardiography loops and provides accurate estimation of LVEF. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 37, 577–586 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huang, W. et al. Point-of-care AI-enhanced novice echocardiography for screening heart failure (PANES-HF). Sci. Rep. 14, 13503 (2024).
Google Scholar
Narang, A. et al. Utility of a deep-learning algorithm to guide novices to acquire echocardiograms for limited diagnostic use. JAMA Cardiol. 6, 624–632 (2021).
Google Scholar
Berg, E. A. R. et al. Fully automatic estimation of global left ventricular systolic function using deep learning in transoesophageal echocardiography. Eur. Heart J. Imaging Methods Pract. 1, qyad007 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. Automatic assessment of left ventricular function for hemodynamic monitoring using artificial intelligence and transesophageal echocardiography. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. (2024).
Google Scholar
Lau, E. S. et al. Deep learning-enabled assessment of left heart structure and function predicts cardiovascular outcomes. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 82, 1936–1948 (2023).
Google Scholar
Howard, J. P. et al. Automated left ventricular dimension assessment using artificial intelligence developed and validated by a UK-wide collaborative. Circ.: Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, e011951 (2021).
Google Scholar
Duffy, G. et al. High-throughput precision phenotyping of left ventricular hypertrophy with cardiovascular deep learning. JAMA Cardiol. 7, 386–395 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gilbert, A. et al. User-intended doppler measurement type prediction combining CNNs with smart post-processing. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 25, 2113–2124 (2021).
Google Scholar
Jeon, J. et al. A unified approach for comprehensive analysis of various spectral and tissue doppler echocardiography. in 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) (IEEE, 2024).
Jevsikov, J. et al. Automated mitral inflow Doppler peak velocity measurement using deep learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 171, 108192 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chen, X. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted left ventricular diastolic function assessment and grading: multiview versus single view. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 36, 1064–1078 (2023).
Google Scholar
Park, J. et al. Artificial intelligence-enhanced automation of left ventricular diastolic assessment: a pilot study for feasibility, diagnostic validation, and outcome prediction. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 14, 352–366 (2024).
Google Scholar
O’Neill, T., Kang, P., Hagendorff, A. & Tayal, B. The clinical applications of left atrial strain: a comprehensive review. Medicina 60, 693 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ferkh, A., Clark, A. & Thomas, L. Left atrial phasic function: physiology, clinical assessment and prognostic value. Heart 109, 1661–1669 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yaku, H., Komtebedde, J., Silvestry, F. E. & Shah, S. J. Deep learning-based automated measurements of echocardiographic estimators of invasive pulmonary capillary wedge pressure perform equally to core lab measurements: results from reduce LAP-HF II. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. (2024).
Konstam, M. A. et al. Evaluation and management of right-sided heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 137, e578–e622 (2018).
Google Scholar
Tokodi, M. et al. Deep learning-based prediction of right ventricular ejection fraction using 2D echocardiograms. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 16, 1005–1018 (2023).
Google Scholar
Murayama, M. et al. Deep learning to assess right ventricular ejection fraction from two-dimensional echocardiograms in precapillary pulmonary hypertension. Echocardiography 41, e15812 (2024).
Google Scholar
Chernyshov, A. et al. Automated segmentation and quantification of the right ventricle in 2-D echocardiography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 50, 540–548 (2024).
Google Scholar
Arbelo, E. et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur. Heart J. 44, 3503–3626 (2023).
Google Scholar
Alwan, L. et al. Current and evolving multimodality cardiac imaging in managing transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 17, 195–211 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yu, X. et al. Using deep learning method to identify left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 38, 759–769 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kamel, M. A. et al. How artificial intelligence can enhance the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis: a review of recent advances and challenges. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 11, 118 (2024).
Google Scholar
Goto, S. et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled fully automated detection of cardiac amyloidosis using electrocardiograms and echocardiograms. Nat. Commun. 12, 2726 (2021).
Google Scholar
Oikonomou, E. K. et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography and echocardiography to track preclinical progression of transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Eur. Heart J. (2025).
Narula, S., Shameer, K., Salem Omar, A. M., Dudley, J. T. & Sengupta, P. P. Machine-learning algorithms to automate morphological and functional assessments in 2D echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 68, 2287–2295 (2016).
Google Scholar
Krishna, H. et al. Fully automated artificial intelligence assessment of aortic stenosis by echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 36, 769–777 (2023).
Google Scholar
Holste, G., Oikonomou, E. K., Mortazavi, B. J., Wang, Z. & Khera, R. Efficient deep learning-based automated diagnosis from echocardiography with contrastive self-supervised learning. Commun. Med. 4, 1–10 (2024).
Holste, G. et al. Severe aortic stenosis detection by deep learning applied to echocardiography. Eur. Heart J. 44, 4592–4604 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wessler, B. S. et al. Automated detection of aortic stenosis using machine learning. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 36, 411–420 (2023).
Google Scholar
Long, A. et al. Deep learning for echo analysis, tracking, and evaluation of mitral regurgitation (DELINEATE-MR). Circulation (2024).
Google Scholar
Vrudhula, A. et al. High-throughput deep learning detection of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 150, 923–933 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wifstad, S. V. et al. EasyPISA: automatic integrated PISA measurements of mitral regurgitation from 2-D color-doppler using deep learning. Ultrasound Med. Biol. (2024).
Google Scholar
Sadeghpour, A. et al. An automated machine learning-based quantitative multiparametric approach for mitral regurgitation severity grading. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging (2024).
Bernard, J. et al. Integrating echocardiography parameters with explainable artificial intelligence for data-driven clustering of primary mitral regurgitation phenotypes. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 16, 1253–1267 (2023).
Google Scholar
Nedadur, R., Wang, B. & Tsang, W. Artificial intelligence for the echocardiographic assessment of valvular heart disease. Heart 108, 1592–1599 (2022).
Google Scholar
Bozkurt, B. et al. Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure. J. Card. Fail. (2021).
Akerman, A. P. et al. Automated echocardiographic detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using artificial intelligence. JACC Adv. (2023).
Google Scholar
Cassianni, C. et al. Automated echocardiographic detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using artificial intelligence is associated with cardiac mortality and heart failure hospitalization. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 37, 914–916 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lin, X. et al. Echocardiography-based AI detection of regional wall motion abnormalities and quantification of cardiac function in myocardial infarction. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9, 903660 (2022).
Google Scholar
Slivnick, J. A. et al. Echocardiographic detection of regional wall motion abnormalities using artificial intelligence compared to human readers. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 37, 655–663 (2024).
Google Scholar
European Society of Cardiology. PROTEUS trial suggests AI for heart scans may benefit decision making for less-experienced clinicians (ESC, 2024); https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/PROTEUS-Trial-suggests-AI-for-heart-scans-may-benefit-decision-making-for-less-experienced-clinicians.
Laumer, F. et al. Assessment of artificial intelligence in echocardiography diagnostics in differentiating Takotsubo syndrome from myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 7, 494–503 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liao, Z. et al. Automatic echocardiographic evaluation of the probability of pulmonary hypertension using machine learning. Pulm. Circ. 13, e12272 (2023).
Google Scholar
Hirata, Y., Tsuji, T., Kotoku, J., Sata, M. & Kusunose, K. Echocardiographic artificial intelligence for pulmonary hypertension classification. Heart 110, 586–593 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mor-Avi, V. et al. Real-time artificial intelligence–based guidance of echocardiographic imaging by novices: image quality and suitability for diagnostic interpretation and quantitative analysis. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 16, e015569 (2023).
Google Scholar
Pasdeloup, D. et al. Real-time echocardiography guidance for optimized apical standard views. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 49, 333–346 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sabo, S. et al. Real-time guidance by deep learning of experienced operators to improve the standardization of echocardiographic acquisitions. Eur. Heart J. Imaging Methods Pract. 1, qyad040 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sabo, S. et al. Real-time guiding by deep learning during echocardiography to reduce left ventricular foreshortening and measurement variability. Eur. Heart J. Imaging Methods Pract. 1, qyad012 (2023).
Google Scholar
Luong, C. et al. Automated estimation of echocardiogram image quality in hospitalized patients. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 37, 229–239 (2021).
Google Scholar
Huang, K.-C. et al. Artificial intelligence aids cardiac image quality assessment for improving precision in strain measurements. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, 335–345 (2021).
Google Scholar
Van De Vyver, G. et al. Regional image quality scoring for 2-D echocardiography using deep learning. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 51, 638–649 (2025).
Google Scholar
Liu, Z. et al. Automated deep neural network-based identification, localization, and tracking of cardiac structures for ultrasound-guided interventional surgery. J. Thorac. Dis. 15, 2129–2140 (2023).
Google Scholar
Baum, E. et al. Acquisition of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound images with deep learning: a randomized trial for educational outcomes with novices. CHEST Pulm. 1, 100023 (2023).
Li, K., Li, A., Xu, Y., Xiong, H. & Meng, M. Q.-H. RL-TEE: autonomous probe guidance for transesophageal echocardiography based on attention-augmented deep reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 21, 1526–1538 (2024).
Steffner, K. R. et al. Deep learning for transesophageal echocardiography view classification. Sci. Rep. 14, 11 (2024).
Google Scholar
Kagiyama, N. Artificial intelligence-based automated echocardiographic measurements and the workflow of sonographers: randomized crossover trial (AI-Echo RCT) (American Heart Association, 2024).
US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov (2023).
Motazedian, P. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound with artificial intelligence-assisted assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. npj Digit. Med. 6, 201 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kagiyama, N. et al. Multicenter validation study for automated left ventricular ejection fraction assessment using a handheld ultrasound with artificial intelligence. Sci. Rep. 14, 15359 (2024).
Google Scholar
Oikonomou, E. K. et al. Artificial intelligence-guided detection of under-recognised cardiomyopathies on point-of-care cardiac ultrasonography: a multicentre study. Lancet Digit. Health 7, e113–e123 (2025).
Google Scholar
Campell, R. OPERA – AI — reporting of handheld echocardiography in suspected heart failure (European Society of Cardiology Congress, 2023).
Tromp, J. et al. Nurse-led home-based detection of cardiac dysfunction by ultrasound: results of the CUMIN pilot study. Eur. Heart J. Digit. Health 5, 163–169 (2024).
Google Scholar
Peck, D. et al. The use of artificial intelligence guidance for rheumatic heart disease screening by novices. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 36, 724–732 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lyon, A. R. et al. 2022 ESC guidelines on cardio-oncology developed in collaboration with the European hematology association (EHA), the European society for therapeutic radiology and oncology (ESTRO) and the international cardio-oncology society (IC-OS). Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 23, e333–e465 (2022).
Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, S.-L. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted evaluation of cardiac function by oncology staff in chemotherapy patients. Eur. Heart J. Digit. Health 5, 278–287 (2024).
Google Scholar
Oikonomou, E. K. et al. A multimodal video-based AI biomarker for aortic stenosis development and progression. JAMA Cardiol. 9, 534–544 (2024).
Google Scholar
Oo, M. M. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted automated heart failure detection and classification from electronic health records. ESC Heart Fail. 11, 2769–2777 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pandey, A. et al. Deep-learning models for the echocardiographic assessment of diastolic dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, 1887–1900 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sengupta, P. P. et al. A machine-learning framework to identify distinct phenotypes of aortic stenosis severity. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 14, 1707–1720 (2021).
Google Scholar
Sánchez-Puente, A. et al. Machine learning to optimize the echocardiographic follow-up of aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 16, 733–744 (2023).
Google Scholar
Sengupta, P. P., Dey, D., Davies, R. H., Duchateau, N. & Yanamala, N. Challenges for augmenting intelligence in cardiac imaging. Lancet Digit. Health 6, e739–e748 (2024).
Google Scholar
Díaz-Rodríguez, N. et al. Connecting the dots in trustworthy artificial intelligence: from AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Inf. Fusion 99, 101896 (2023).
Lüscher, T. F., Wenzl, F. A., D’Ascenzo, F., Friedman, P. A. & Antoniades, C. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: clinical applications. Eur. Heart J. (2024).
Khera, R. et al. Transforming cardiovascular care with artificial intelligence: from discovery to practice: JACC state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 84, 97–114 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tseng, A. S., Lopez-Jimenez, F. & Pellikka, P. A. Future guidelines for artificial intelligence in echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 35, 878–882 (2022).
Google Scholar
Vrudhula, A., Kwan, A. C., Ouyang, D. & Cheng, S. Machine learning and bias in medical imaging: opportunities and challenges. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 17, e015495 (2024).
Google Scholar
Mihan, A., Pandey, A. & Spall, H. G. V. Mitigating the risk of artificial intelligence bias in cardiovascular care. Lancet Digit. Health 6, e749–e754 (2024).
Google Scholar
Seyyed-Kalantari, L., Zhang, H., McDermott, M. B. A., Chen, I. Y. & Ghassemi, M. Underdiagnosis bias of artificial intelligence algorithms applied to chest radiographs in under-served patient populations. Nat. Med. 27, 2176–2182 (2021).
Google Scholar
Duffy, G. et al. Confounders mediate AI prediction of demographics in medical imaging. npj Digit. Med. 5, 188 (2022).
Google Scholar
Brown, A. et al. Detecting shortcut learning for fair medical AI using shortcut testing. Nat. Commun. 14, 4314 (2023).
Google Scholar
Banerjee, I. et al. “Shortcuts” causing bias in radiology artificial intelligence: causes, evaluation, and mitigation. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 20, 842–851 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Zhang, H., Gichoya, J. W., Katabi, D. & Ghassemi, M. The limits of fair medical imaging AI in real-world generalization. Nat. Med. (2024).
Dohare, S. et al. Loss of plasticity in deep continual learning. Nature 632, 768–774 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gama, F. et al. Implementation frameworks for artificial intelligence translation into health care practice: scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 24, e32215 (2022).
Google Scholar
Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O. & Topol, E. J. AI in health and medicine. Nat. Med. 28, 31–38 (2022).
Google Scholar
European Parliament. Directorate general for parliamentary research services. artificial intelligence in healthcare: applications, risks, and ethical and societal impacts (2022); https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/568473.
Khera, R., Simon, M. A. & Ross, J. S. Automation bias and assistive AI: risk of harm from AI-driven clinical decision support. JAMA 330, 2255–2257 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, F. & Beecy, A. Implementing AI models in clinical workflows: a roadmap. BMJ Evid. Based Med. (2024).
Gill, S. K. et al. Artificial intelligence to enhance clinical value across the spectrum of cardiovascular healthcare. Eur. Heart J. 44, 713–725 (2023).
Google Scholar
Christensen, M., Vukadinovic, M., Yuan, N. & Ouyang, D. Vision–language foundation model for echocardiogram interpretation. Nat. Med. 30, 1481–1488 (2024).
Google Scholar
Barros-Gomes, S. et al. Characteristics and consequences of work-related musculoskeletal pain among cardiac sonographers compared with peer employees: a multisite cross-sectional study. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 32, 1138–1146 (2019).
Google Scholar
Li, K. et al. Autonomous navigation of an ultrasound probe towards standard scan planes with deep reinforcement learning. in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, 2021).
Soemantoro, R., Kardos, A., Tang, G. & Zhao, Y. An AI-powered navigation framework to achieve an automated acquisition of cardiac ultrasound images. Sci. Rep. 13, 15008 (2023).
Google Scholar
Amezcua, K.-L. et al. Design and testing of ultrasound probe adapters for a robotic imaging platform. Sci. Rep. 14, 5102 (2024).
Google Scholar
Villalobos Lizardi, J. C. et al. A guide for assessment of myocardial stiffness in health and disease. Nat. Cardiovasc. Res. 1, 8–22 (2022).
Google Scholar
Caenen, A. et al. Ultrasound shear wave elastography in cardiology. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 17, 314–329 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hathaway, Q. A. et al. Ultrasonic texture features for assessing cardiac remodeling and dysfunction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 80, 2187–2201 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sengupta, P. P. & Chandrashekhar, Y. Advancing myocardial tissue analysis using echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 17, 228–231 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jamthikar, A. D. et al. Cardiac ultrasonic tissue characterization in myocardial infarction based on deep transfer learning and radiomics features. Preprint at medRxiv (2024).
Amado-Rey, A., GonçalvesSeabra, A. & Stieglitz, T. Towards ultrasound wearable technology for cardiovascular monitoring: from device development to clinical validation. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. (2024).
Moisello, E. et al. PMUT and CMUT devices for biomedical applications: a review. IEEE Access 12, 18640–18657 (2024).
Hu, H. et al. A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager. Nature 613, 667–675 (2023).
Google Scholar
Democratizing echocardiography with AI. Us2.ai (2023).
Turing, A. M. On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-42, 230–265 (1937).
Hunter, D. J. & Holmes, C. Where medical statistics meets artificial intelligence. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 1211–1219 (2023).
Google Scholar
Haug, C. J. & Drazen, J. M. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1201–1208 (2023).
Google Scholar
Shehab, M. et al. Machine learning in medical applications: a review of state-of-the-art methods. Comput. Biol. Med. 145, 105458 (2022).
Google Scholar
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sidey-Gibbons, J. A. M. & Sidey-Gibbons, C. J. Machine learning in medicine: a practical introduction. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 19, 64 (2019).
Google Scholar
Reading Turchioe, M. et al. Systematic review of current natural language processing methods and applications in cardiology. Heart 108, 909–916 (2022).
Google Scholar
Will ChatGPT transform healthcare? Nat. Med. 29, 505–506 (2023).
Boonstra, M. J., Weissenbacher, D., Moore, J. H., Gonzalez-Hernandez, G. & Asselbergs, F. W. Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing cardiology with large language models. Eur. Heart J. 45, 332–345 (2024).
Google Scholar
Amadou, A. A. et al. EchoApex: a general-purpose vision foundation model for echocardiography. Preprint at (2024).
Zhang, Z., Wu, Q., Ding, S., Wang, X. & Ye, J. Echo-vision-FM: a pre-training and fine-tuning framework for echocardiogram videos vision foundation model. Preprint at medRxiv (2024).
Collins, G. S., Reitsma, J. B., Altman, D. G. & Moons, K. G. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement. BMC Med. 13, 1 (2015).
Google Scholar
Liu, X., Cruz Rivera, S., Moher, D., Calvert, M. J. & Denniston, A. K. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat. Med. 26, 1364–1374 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sengupta, P. P. et al. Proposed requirements for cardiovascular imaging-related machine learning evaluation (PRIME): a checklist. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 13, 2017–2035 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lafitte, S. et al. Integrating artificial intelligence into an echocardiography department: feasibility and comparative study of automated versus human measurements in a high-volume clinical setting. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. (2025).
link