Robertson, M. P. & Joyce, G. F. The origins of the RNA world. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a003608 (2012).
Google Scholar
Papastavrou, N., Horning, D. P. & Joyce, G. F. RNA-catalyzed evolution of catalytic RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2321592121 (2024).
Google Scholar
Pearce, B. K. D., Pudritz, R. E., Semenov, D. A. & Henning, T. K. Origin of the RNA world: the fate of nucleobases in warm little ponds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11327–11332 (2017).
Google Scholar
Palcau, A. C. et al. CircPVT1: a pivotal circular node intersecting long non-coding-PVT1 and c-MYC oncogenic signals. Mol. Cancer 21, 33 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mou, X., Liew, S. W. & Kwok, C. K. Identification and targeting of G-quadruplex structures in MALAT1 long non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, 397–410 (2022).
Google Scholar
Roden, C. & Gladfelter, A. S. RNA contributions to the form and function of biomolecular condensates. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 183–195 (2021).
Google Scholar
Morris, K. V. & Mattick, J. S. The rise of regulatory RNA. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 423–437 (2014).
Google Scholar
Yang, H., Li, Q., Stroup, E. K., Wang, S. & Ji, Z. Widespread stable noncanonical peptides identified by integrated analyses of ribosome profiling and ORF features. Nat. Commun. 15, 1932 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nussbacher, J. K., Tabet, R., Yeo, G. W. & Lagier-Tourenne, C. Disruption of RNA metabolism in neurological diseases and emerging therapeutic interventions. Neuron 102, 294–320 (2019).
Google Scholar
Wang, W., van Niekerk, E., Willis, D. E. & Twiss, J. L. RNA transport and localized protein synthesis in neurological disorders and neural repair. Dev. Neurobiol. 67, 1166–1182 (2007).
Google Scholar
Goodall, G. J. & Wickramasinghe, V. O. RNA in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21, 22–36 (2021).
Google Scholar
Egger, G. & Arimondo, P. Drug Discovery in Cancer Epigenetics (Academic, 2015).
Zhou, Y., Huang, T., Li, T. & Sun, J. RNA Modification in Human Cancers: Roles and Therapeutic Implications (Frontiers Media, 2022).
Giangrande, P. H., de Franciscis, V. & Rossi, J. J. RNA Therapeutics: the Evolving Landscape of RNA Therapeutics (Academic, 2022).
Ahmad, R. U. & Pathak, S. Unlocking the therapeutic potential of RNA: a comprehensive review of RNA-based therapy. Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University (2023).
Lin, C. & Miles, W. O. Beyond CLIP: advances and opportunities to measure RBP–RNA and RNA–RNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 5490–5501 (2019).
Google Scholar
Baralle, F. E. & Giudice, J. Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 437–451 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sciarrillo, R. et al. The role of alternative splicing in cancer: from oncogenesis to drug resistance. Drug Resist. Updat. 53, 100728 (2020).
Google Scholar
Andreassi, C., Crerar, H. & Riccio, A. Post-transcriptional processing of mRNA in neurons: the vestiges of the RNA world drive transcriptome diversity. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 11, 304 (2018).
Google Scholar
Andreassi, C. & Riccio, A. To localize or not to localize: mRNA fate is in 3′UTR ends. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 465–474 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mayr, C. Regulation by 3′-untranslated regions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 51, 171–194 (2017).
Google Scholar
Van Nostrand, E. L. et al. A large-scale binding and functional map of human RNA-binding proteins. Nature 583, 711–719 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hentze, M. W., Castello, A., Schwarzl, T. & Preiss, T. A brave new world of RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 327–341 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zhang, R. & Su, B. Small but influential: the role of microRNAs on gene regulatory network and 3′UTR evolution. J. Genet. Genomics 36, 1–6 (2009).
Google Scholar
Rajyaguru, P. & Parker, R. RGG motif proteins: modulators of mRNA functional states. Cell Cycle 11, 2594–2599 (2012).
Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. C., Cech, T. R. & Parker, R. R. Biochemical properties and biological functions of FET proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 355–379 (2015).
Google Scholar
Taliaferro, J. M. et al. Distal alternative last exons localize mRNAs to neural projections. Mol. Cell 61, 821–833 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hinnebusch, A. G., Ivanov, I. P. & Sonenberg, N. Translational control by 5′-untranslated regions of eukaryotic mRNAs. Science 352, 1413–1416 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wieder, N. et al. Differences in 5′ untranslated regions highlight the importance of translational regulation of dosage sensitive genes. Genome Biol. 25, 111 (2024).
Google Scholar
Jia, L. et al. Decoding mRNA translatability and stability from the 5′ UTR. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 814–821 (2020).
Google Scholar
Ryczek, N., Łyś, A. & Makałowska, I. The functional meaning of 5′UTR in protein-coding genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 2976 (2023).
Google Scholar
Colliva, A. & Tongiorgi, E. Distinct role of 5′UTR sequences in dendritic trafficking of BDNF mRNA: additional mechanisms for the BDNF splice variants spatial code. Mol. Brain 14, 10 (2021).
Google Scholar
Derti, A. et al. A quantitative atlas of polyadenylation in five mammals. Genome Res. 22, 1173–1183 (2012).
Google Scholar
Hilgers, V. et al. Neural-specific elongation of 3′ UTRs during drosophila development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15864–15869 (2011).
Google Scholar
Miura, P., Shenker, S., Andreu-Agullo, C., Westholm, J. O. & Lai, E. C. Widespread and extensive lengthening of 3′ UTRs in the mammalian brain. Genome Res. 23, 812–825 (2013).
Google Scholar
Andreassi, C. et al. Cytoplasmic cleavage of IMPA1 3′ UTR is necessary for maintaining axon integrity. Cell Rep. 34, 108778 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tushev, G. et al. Alternative 3′ UTRs modify the localization, regulatory potential, stability, and plasticity of mRNAs in neuronal compartments. Neuron 98, 495–511.e6 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kislauskis, E. H., Zhu, X. & Singer, R. H. Sequences responsible for intracellular localization of beta-actin messenger RNA also affect cell phenotype. J. Cell Biol. 127, 441–451 (1994).
Google Scholar
Braunschweig, U. et al. Widespread intron retention in mammals functionally tunes transcriptomes. Genome Res. 24, 1774–1786 (2014).
Google Scholar
Petric-Howe, M. et al. Physiological intron retaining transcripts in the cytoplasm abound during human motor neurogenesis. Genome Res. 32, 1808–1825 (2022).
Google Scholar
Skalska, L., Beltran-Nebot, M., Ule, J. & Jenner, R. G. Regulatory feedback from nascent RNA to chromatin and transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 331–337 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wong, J. J.-L., Au, A. Y. M., Ritchie, W. & Rasko, J. E. J. Intron retention in mRNA: no longer nonsense: known and putative roles of intron retention in normal and disease biology: known and putative roles of intron retention in normal and disease biology. Bioessays 38, 41–49 (2016).
Google Scholar
Wong, J. J.-L. et al. Orchestrated intron retention regulates normal granulocyte differentiation. Cell 154, 583–595 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ortiz, R. et al. Recruitment of Staufen2 enhances dendritic localization of an intron-containing CaMKIIα mRNA. Cell Rep. 20, 13–20 (2017).
Google Scholar
Luisier, R. et al. Intron retention and nuclear loss of SFPQ are molecular hallmarks of ALS. Nat. Commun. 9, 2010 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ma, W. & Mayr, C. A membraneless organelle associated with the endoplasmic reticulum enables 3′UTR-mediated protein-protein interactions. Cell 175, 1492–1506.e19 (2018).
Google Scholar
Horste, E. L. et al. Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output. Mol. Cell 83, 4509–4523.e11 (2023).
Google Scholar
Luo, Y. & Mayr, C. How the location of protein synthesis controls protein function. Biophys. J. 123, 309a (2024).
Google Scholar
Luo, Y. et al. mRNA interactions with disordered regions control protein activity. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Luisier, R., Andreassi, C., Fournier, L. & Riccio, A. The predicted RNA-binding protein regulome of axonal mRNAs. Genome Res. 33, 1497–1512 (2023).
Google Scholar
Gadir, N., Haim-Vilmovsky, L., Kraut-Cohen, J. & Gerst, J. E. Localization of mRNAs coding for mitochondrial proteins in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 17, 1551–1565 (2011).
Google Scholar
Morita, M. et al. mTORC1 controls mitochondrial activity and biogenesis through 4E-BP-dependent translational regulation. Cell Metab. 18, 698–711 (2013).
Google Scholar
Gandin, V. et al. nanoCAGE reveals 5′ UTR features that define specific modes of translation of functionally related MTOR-sensitive mRNAs. Genome Res. 26, 636–648 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bugler, B., Amalric, F. & Prats, H. Alternative initiation of translation determines cytoplasmic or nuclear localization of basic fibroblast growth factor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 573–577 (1991).
Google Scholar
Lee, I. et al. New class of microRNA targets containing simultaneous 5′-UTR and 3′-UTR interaction sites. Genome Res. 19, 1175–1183 (2009).
Google Scholar
Jia, J., Yao, P., Arif, A. & Fox, P. L. Regulation and dysregulation of 3′UTR-mediated translational control. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 29–34 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mattick, J. S. et al. Long non-coding RNAs: definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 430–447 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kageyama, Y., Kondo, T. & Hashimoto, Y. Coding vs non-coding: translatability of short ORFs found in putative non-coding transcripts. Biochimie 93, 1981–1986 (2011).
Google Scholar
Nam, J.-W., Choi, S.-W. & You, B.-H. Incredible RNA: dual functions of coding and noncoding. Mol. Cell 39, 367–374 (2016).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. Extensive translation of circular RNAs driven by N6-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 27, 626–641 (2017).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C. M., Chun, S. Y., Mills, R. E. & Todd, P. K. Translation of upstream open reading frames in a model of neuronal differentiation. BMC Genomics 20, 391 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rodriguez, J. M. et al. Evidence for widespread translation of 5’ untranslated regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 8112–8126 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sudmant, P. H., Lee, H., Dominguez, D., Heiman, M. & Burge, C. B. Widespread accumulation of ribosome-associated isolated 3′ UTRs in neuronal cell populations of the aging brain. Cell Rep. 25, 2447–2456.e4 (2018).
Google Scholar
Osman, I., Tay, M. L.-I. & Pek, J. W. Stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs): a new layer of gene regulation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 73, 3507–3519 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A. M. et al. Circular stable intronic RNAs possess distinct biological features and are deregulated in bladder cancer. NAR Cancer 5, zcad041 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chan, S. N. & Pek, J. W. Stable intronic sequence RNAs (sisRNAs): an expanding universe. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44, 258–272 (2019).
Google Scholar
Talhouarne, G. J. S. & Gall, J. G. Lariat intronic RNAs in the cytoplasm of vertebrate cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E7970–E7977 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wilson, T. J. & Lilley, D. RNA catalysis — is that it? RNA 21, 534–537 (2015).
Google Scholar
Cech, T. R. & Steitz, J. A. The noncoding RNA revolution — trashing old rules to forge new ones. Cell 157, 77–94 (2014).
Google Scholar
Sebastián, D. et al. TP53INP2-dependent activation of muscle autophagy ameliorates sarcopenia and promotes healthy aging. Autophagy 20, 1815–1824 (2024).
Google Scholar
Crerar, H. et al. Regulation of NGF signaling by an axonal untranslated mRNA. Neuron 102, 553–563.e8 (2019).
Google Scholar
Valluy, J. et al. A coding-independent function of an alternative Ube3a transcript during neuronal development. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 666–673 (2015).
Google Scholar
Lyford, G. L. et al. Arc, a growth factor and activity-regulated gene, encodes a novel cytoskeleton-associated protein that is enriched in neuronal dendrites. Neuron 14, 433–445 (1995).
Google Scholar
Steward, O. & Worley, P. F. Selective targeting of newly synthesized Arc mRNA to active synapses requires NMDA receptor activation. Neuron 30, 227–240 (2001).
Google Scholar
Ashley, J. et al. Retrovirus-like Gag protein Arc1 binds RNA and traffics across synaptic boutons. Cell 172, 262–274.e11 (2018).
Google Scholar
Pastuzyn, E. D. et al. The neuronal gene Arc encodes a repurposed retrotransposon Gag protein that mediates intercellular RNA transfer. Cell 172, 275–288.e18 (2018).
Google Scholar
O’Brien, K., Breyne, K., Ughetto, S., Laurent, L. C. & Breakefield, X. O. RNA delivery by extracellular vesicles in mammalian cells and its applications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 585–606 (2020).
Google Scholar
Kafida, M., Karela, M. & Giakountis, A. RNA-independent regulatory functions of lncRNA in complex disease. Cancers 16, 2728 (2024).
Google Scholar
Singh, G., Pratt, G., Yeo, G. W. & Moore, M. J. The clothes make the mRNA: past and present trends in mRNP fashion. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 325–354 (2015).
Google Scholar
Singh, S., Shyamal, S. & Panda, A. C. Detecting RNA–RNA interactome. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 13, e1715 (2022).
Google Scholar
Guil, S. & Esteller, M. RNA–RNA interactions in gene regulation: the coding and noncoding players. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 248–256 (2015).
Google Scholar
Yoon, J.-H., Abdelmohsen, K. & Gorospe, M. Functional interactions among microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 9–14 (2014).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. GRID-seq reveals the global RNA–chromatin interactome. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 940–950 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cao, X., Zhang, Y., Ding, Y. & Wan, Y. Identification of RNA structures and their roles in RNA functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 784–801 (2024).
Google Scholar
Doyle, M. & Kiebler, M. A. Mechanisms of dendritic mRNA transport and its role in synaptic tagging. EMBO J. 30, 3540–3552 (2011).
Google Scholar
Mortimer, S. A., Kidwell, M. A. & Doudna, J. A. Insights into RNA structure and function from genome-wide studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 469–479 (2014).
Google Scholar
Sugimoto, Y. et al. hiCLIP reveals the in vivo atlas of mRNA secondary structures recognized by Staufen 1. Nature 519, 491–494 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wan, Y. et al. Landscape and variation of RNA secondary structure across the human transcriptome. Nature 505, 706–709 (2014).
Google Scholar
Leppek, K., Das, R. & Barna, M. Functional 5′ UTR mRNA structures in eukaryotic translation regulation and how to find them. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 158–174 (2017).
Google Scholar
Jacquet, K. et al. The TIP60 complex regulates bivalent chromatin recognition by 53BP1 through direct H4K20me binding and H2AK15 acetylation. Mol. Cell 62, 409–421 (2016).
Google Scholar
Beaudoin, J.-D. et al. Analyses of mRNA structure dynamics identify embryonic gene regulatory programs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 677–686 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wu, M.-Z. et al. Interplay between HDAC3 and WDR5 is essential for hypoxia-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Mol. Cell 43, 811–822 (2011).
Google Scholar
Paz, I. et al. RBPmap: a web server for mapping binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W361–W367 (2014).
Google Scholar
Xu, W., Biswas, J., Singer, R. H. & Rosbash, M. Targeted RNA editing: novel tools to study post-transcriptional regulation. Mol. Cell 82, 389–403 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hu, X., Zou, Q., Yao, L. & Yang, X. Survey of the binding preferences of RNA-binding proteins to RNA editing events. Genome Biol. 23, 169 (2022).
Google Scholar
Medina-Munoz, H. C. et al. Expanded palette of RNA base editors for comprehensive RBP–RNA interactome studies. Nat. Commun. 15, 875 (2024).
Google Scholar
Seo, K. W. & Kleiner, R. E. Profiling dynamic RNA–protein interactions using small-molecule-induced RNA editing. Nat. Chem. Biol. 19, 1361–1371 (2023).
Google Scholar
Baysal, B. E., Sharma, S., Hashemikhabir, S. & Janga, S. C. RNA editing in pathogenesis of cancer. Cancer Res. 77, 3733–3739 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wassmer, E., Koppány, G., Hermes, M., Diederichs, S. & Caudron-Herger, M. Refining the pool of RNA-binding domains advances the classification and prediction of RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 7504–7522 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zigdon, I. et al. Beyond RNA binding domains: determinants of protein–RNA binding. RNA 30, 1620–1633 (2024).
Google Scholar
Lunde, B. M., Moore, C. & Varani, G. RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 479–490 (2007).
Google Scholar
Gronland, G. R. & Ramos, A. The devil is in the domain: understanding protein recognition of multiple RNA targets. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 45, 1305–1311 (2017).
Google Scholar
Corley, M., Burns, M. C. & Yeo, G. W. How RNA-binding proteins interact with RNA: molecules and mechanisms. Mol. Cell 78, 9–29 (2020).
Google Scholar
Street, L. A. et al. Large-scale map of RNA-binding protein interactomes across the mRNA life cycle. Mol. Cell 84, 3790–3809.e8 (2024).
Google Scholar
He, S., Valkov, E., Cheloufi, S. & Murn, J. The nexus between RNA-binding proteins and their effectors. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 276–294 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Structure, phosphorylation and U2AF65 binding of the N-terminal domain of splicing factor 1 during 3′-splice site recognition. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 1343–1354 (2013).
Google Scholar
Järvelin, A. I., Noerenberg, M., Davis, I. & Castello, A. The new (dis)order in RNA regulation. Cell Commun. Signal. 14, 9 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kato, M., Zhou, X. & McKnight, S. L. How do protein domains of low sequence complexity work? RNA 28, 3–15 (2022).
Google Scholar
Stowell, J. A. W. et al. A low-complexity region in the YTH domain protein Mmi1 enhances RNA binding. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 9210–9222 (2018).
Google Scholar
Nicastro, G. et al. Direct m6A recognition by IMP1 underlays an alternative model of target selection for non-canonical methyl-readers. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 8774–8786 (2023).
Google Scholar
Xu, C. et al. Structural basis for selective binding of m6A RNA by the YTHDC1 YTH domain. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 927–929 (2014).
Google Scholar
Woods, C. T. et al. Comparative visualization of the RNA suboptimal conformational ensemble in vivo. Biophys. J. 113, 290–301 (2017).
Google Scholar
Liu, N. et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA–protein interactions. Nature 518, 560–564 (2015).
Google Scholar
Dominissini, D. et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 485, 201–206 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tang, J., Wang, X., Xiao, D., Liu, S. & Tao, Y. The chromatin-associated RNAs in gene regulation and cancer. Mol. Cancer 22, 27 (2023).
Google Scholar
Calandrelli, R. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the interplay between chromatin-associated RNA and 3D genome organization in human cells. Nat. Commun. 14, 6519 (2023).
Google Scholar
Childs-Disney, J. L. et al. Targeting RNA structures with small molecules. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 736–762 (2022).
Google Scholar
Balaratnam, S. et al. Investigating the NRAS 5′ UTR as a target for small molecules. Cell Chem. Biol. 30, 643–657.e8 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wu, L. et al. RNALocate v3.0: advancing the repository of RNA subcellular localization with dynamic analysis and prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D284–D292 (2025).
Google Scholar
Rangaraju, V., tom Dieck, S. & Schuman, E. M. Local translation in neuronal compartments: how local is local? EMBO Rep. 18, 693–711 (2017).
Google Scholar
Bourke, A. M., Schwarz, A. & Schuman, E. M. De-centralizing the central dogma: mRNA translation in space and time. Mol. Cell 83, 452–468 (2023).
Google Scholar
Spitale, R. C. & Incarnato, D. Probing the dynamic RNA structurome and its functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 178–196 (2023).
Google Scholar
Goering, R., Arora, A., Pockalny, M. C. & Taliaferro, J. M. RNA localization mechanisms transcend cell morphology. eLife 12, e80040 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yang, L. et al. The challenges of investigating RNA function. Mol. Cell 84, 3567–3571 (2024).
Google Scholar
Das, S., Vera, M., Gandin, V., Singer, R. H. & Tutucci, E. Intracellular mRNA transport and localized translation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 483–504 (2021).
Google Scholar
Andreassi, C. et al. An NGF-responsive element targets myo-inositol monophosphatase-1 mRNA to sympathetic neuron axons. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 291–301 (2010).
Google Scholar
Jambor, H., Brunel, C. & Ephrussi, A. Dimerization of oskar 3′ UTRs promotes hitchhiking for RNA localization in the drosophila oocyte. RNA 17, 2049–2057 (2011).
Google Scholar
Will, T. J. et al. Deep sequencing and high-resolution imaging reveal compartment-specific localization of Bdnf mRNA in hippocampal neurons. Sci. Signal. 6, rs16 (2013).
Google Scholar
Sample, P. J. et al. Human 5′ UTR design and variant effect prediction from a massively parallel translation assay. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 803–809 (2019).
Google Scholar
Davuluri, R. V., Suzuki, Y., Sugano, S. & Zhang, M. Q. CART classification of human 5′ UTR sequences. Genome Res. 10, 1807–1816 (2000).
Google Scholar
Karollus, A., Avsec, Ž. & Gagneur, J. Predicting mean ribosome load for 5′UTR of any length using deep learning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, e1008982 (2021).
Google Scholar
Cuperus, J. T., Groves, B. & Kuchina, A. Deep learning of the regulatory grammar of yeast 5′ untranslated regions from 500,000 random sequences. Genome 27, 2015–2024 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gilliot, P.-A. & Gorochowski, T. E. Transfer learning for cross-context prediction of protein expression from 5′UTR sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, e58 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wayment-Steele, H. K. et al. Deep learning models for predicting RNA degradation via dual crowdsourcing. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 1174–1184 (2022).
Google Scholar
He, S., Gao, B., Sabnis, R. & Sun, Q. RNAdegformer: accurate prediction of mRNA degradation at nucleotide resolution with deep learning. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbac581 (2023).
Google Scholar
Garg, A., Singhal, N., Kumar, R. & Kumar, M. mRNALoc: a novel machine-learning based in-silico tool to predict mRNA subcellular localization. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, W239–W243 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z.-Y. et al. Design powerful predictor for mRNA subcellular location prediction in Homo sapiens. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 526–535 (2021).
Google Scholar
Samacoits, A. et al. A computational framework to study sub-cellular RNA localization. Nat. Commun. 9, 4584 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yan, Z., Lécuyer, E. & Blanchette, M. Prediction of mRNA subcellular localization using deep recurrent neural networks. Bioinformatics 35, i333–i342 (2019).
Google Scholar
Musleh, S., Islam, M. T., Qureshi, R., Alajez, N. M. & Alam, T. Correction: MSLP: mRNA subcellular localization predictor based on machine learning techniques. BMC Bioinformatics 24, 156 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wang, D. et al. DM3Loc: multi-label mRNA subcellular localization prediction and analysis based on multi-head self-attention mechanism. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e46 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zeng, M. et al. DeepLncLoc: a deep learning framework for long non-coding RNA subcellular localization prediction based on subsequence embedding. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbab360 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. Deciphering 3′UTR mediated gene regulation using interpretable deep representation learning. Adv. Sci. 11, e2407013 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sato, K., Akiyama, M. & Sakakibara, Y. RNA secondary structure prediction using deep learning with thermodynamic integration. Nat. Commun. 12, 941 (2021).
Google Scholar
Fu, L. et al. UFold: fast and accurate RNA secondary structure prediction with deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, e14 (2022).
Google Scholar
Singh, J., Hanson, J., Paliwal, K. & Zhou, Y. RNA secondary structure prediction using an ensemble of two-dimensional deep neural networks and transfer learning. Nat. Commun. 10, 5407 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sapoval, N. et al. Current progress and open challenges for applying deep learning across the biosciences. Nat. Commun. 13, 1728 (2022).
Google Scholar
Weinberg, D. E. et al. Improved ribosome-footprint and mRNA measurements provide insights into dynamics and regulation of yeast translation. Cell Rep. 14, 1787–1799 (2016).
Google Scholar
Qiu, X. Sequence similarity governs generalizability of de novo deep learning models for RNA secondary structure prediction. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011047 (2023).
Google Scholar
Flamm, C. et al. Caveats to deep learning approaches to RNA secondary structure prediction. Front. Bioinform. 2, 835422 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schlusser, N., González, A., Pandey, M. & Zavolan, M. Current limitations in predicting mRNA translation with deep learning models. Genome Biol. 25, 227 (2024).
Google Scholar
Tomasev, N. et al. Pushing the limits of self-supervised ResNets: can we outperform supervised learning without labels on ImageNet? In First Workshop on Pre-training: Perspectives, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward (ICML, 2022).
Radford, A. et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In Proc. 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T.) Vol. 139 8748–8763 (PMLR, 2021).
Waisberg, E. et al. GPT-4: a new era of artificial intelligence in medicine. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 192, 3197–3200 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. et al. Multiple sequence alignment-based RNA language model and its application to structural inference. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, e3 (2024).
Google Scholar
Gong, T. & Bu, D. Language models enable zero-shot prediction of RNA secondary structures including pseudoknots. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Yin, W. et al. ERNIE-RNA: an RNA language model with structure-enhanced representations. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Wang, N. et al. Multi-purpose RNA language modelling with motif-aware pretraining and type-guided fine-tuning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 548–557 (2024).
Google Scholar
Akiyama, M. & Sakakibara, Y. Informative RNA base embedding for RNA structural alignment and clustering by deep representation learning. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 4, lqac012 (2022).
Google Scholar
Chen, J. et al. Interpretable RNA foundation model from unannotated data for highly accurate RNA structure and function predictions. Preprint at bioRxiv (2022).
Penić, R. J., Vlašić, T., Huber, R. G., Wan, Y. & Šikić, M. RiNALMo: general-purpose RNA language models can generalize well on structure prediction tasks. Preprint at (2024).
Yamada, K. & Hamada, M. Prediction of RNA–protein interactions using a nucleotide language model. Bioinform. Adv. 2, vbac023 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Uni-Rna: universal pre-trained models revolutionize RNA research. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Chen, K. et al. Self-supervised learning on millions of primary RNA sequences from 72 vertebrates improves sequence-based RNA splicing prediction. Brief. Bioinform. 25, bbae163 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sun, L. et al. Predicting dynamic cellular protein–RNA interactions by deep learning using in vivo RNA structures. Cell Res. 31, 495–516 (2021).
Google Scholar
Flynn, R. A. et al. Transcriptome-wide interrogation of RNA secondary structure in living cells with icSHAPE. Nat. Protoc. 11, 273–290 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rao, R., Meier, J., Sercu, T., Ovchinnikov, S. & Rives, A. Transformer protein language models are unsupervised structure learners. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2021).
Vig, J. et al. BERTology meets biology: interpreting attention in protein language models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations 2021 (ICLR, 2021).
Ali, S. et al. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): what we know and what is left to attain trustworthy artificial intelligence. Inf. Fusion 99, 101805 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhao, H. et al. Explainability for large language models: a survey. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 15, 20 (2024).
Google Scholar
Vu, M. H. et al. Linguistically inspired roadmap for building biologically reliable protein language models. Nat. Mach. Intell. 5, 485–496 (2023).
Google Scholar
Dalla-Torre, H. et al. The nucleotide transformer: building and evaluating robust foundation models for human genomics. Nat. Methods 22, 287–297 (2025).
Google Scholar
Yang, Y. et al. Deciphering 3′ UTR mediated gene regulation using interpretable deep representation learning. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 11, e2407013 (2024).
Google Scholar
Ren, Y. et al. BEACON: benchmark for comprehensive RNA tasks and language models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37, 92891–92921 (2024).
Su, J. et al. SaProt: protein language modelling with structure-aware vocabulary. In Proceedings of the International Confernce on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2024).
Poli, M. et al. Hyena hierarchy: towards larger convolutional language models. ICML 202, 28043–28078 (2023).
Beck, M. et al. xLSTM: extended long short-term memory. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37, 107547–107603 (2025).
Dai, D. et al. DeepSeekMoE: towards ultimate expert specialization in mixture-of-experts language models. In Proc. 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Ku, L.-W., Martins, A. & Srikumar, V.) Vol. 1: Long Papers, 1280–1297 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024).
Peng, B., Quesnelle, J., Fan, H. & Shippole, E. YaRN: efficient context window extension of large language models. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations (2024).
He, L. et al. Pre-training co-evolutionary protein representation via a pairwise masked language model. Preprint at (2021).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lin, Z. et al. Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic-level protein structure with a language model. Science 379, 1123–1130 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zablocki, L. I. et al. Comprehensive benchmarking of large language models for RNA secondary structure prediction. Brief. Bioinform. 26, bbaf137 (2025).
Google Scholar
Hastings, J. Primer on ontologies. Methods Mol. Biol. 1446, 3–13 (2017).
Google Scholar
Cavalleri, E. et al. An ontology-based knowledge graph for representing interactions involving RNA molecules. Sci. Data 11, 906 (2024).
Google Scholar
Bepler, T. & Berger, B. Learning the protein language: evolution, structure, and function. Cell Syst. 12, 654–669.e3 (2021).
Google Scholar
Zhou, Z. et al. Enhancing efficiency of protein language models with minimal wet-lab data through few-shot learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 5566 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, N. et al. OntoProtein: protein pretraining with gene ontology embedding. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations 2022 (ICLR, 2022).
Kulmanov, M. et al. Protein function prediction as approximate semantic entailment. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 220–228 (2024).
Google Scholar
Fiannaca, A., La Rosa, M., La Paglia, L., Gaglio, S. & Urso, A. GOWDL: gene ontology-driven wide and deep learning model for cell typing of scRNA-seq data. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad332 (2023).
Google Scholar
Yin, Q. & Chen, L. CellTICS: an explainable neural network for cell-type identification and interpretation based on single-cell RNA-seq data. Brief. Bioinform. 25, bbad449 (2023).
Google Scholar
He, Y. et al. LucaOne: generalized biological foundation model with unified nucleic acid and protein language. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Fradkin, P. et al. Orthrus: towards evolutionary and functional RNA foundation models. In NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on AI for New Drug Modalities (2024).
Boyd, N. et al. ATOM-1: a foundation model for RNA structure and function built on chemical mapping data. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
He, S. et al. Ribonanza: deep learning of RNA structure through dual crowdsourcing. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Garau-Luis, J. J. et al. Multi-modal transfer learning between biological foundation models. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37, 78431–78450 (2024).
Jha, K., Karmakar, S. & Saha, S. Graph-BERT and language model-based framework for protein–protein interaction identification. Sci. Rep. 13, 5663 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zang, X., Zhao, X. & Tang, B. Hierarchical molecular graph self-supervised learning for property prediction. Commun. Chem. 6, 34 (2023).
Google Scholar
Birnbaum, F., Jain, S., Madry, A. & Keating, A. E. Jointly embedding protein structures and sequences through residue level alignment. PRX Life 2, 043013 (2024).
Google Scholar
Barua, A., Ahmed, M. U. & Begum, S. A systematic literature review on multimodal machine learning: applications, challenges, gaps and future directions. IEEE Access 11, 14804–14831 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, S. & Tang, H. Multimodal alignment and fusion: a survey. Preprint at (2024).
Liang, P. P., Zadeh, A. & Morency, L.-P. Foundations & trends in multimodal machine learning: principles, challenges, and open questions. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 1–42 (2024).
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. et al. A systematic study of joint representation learning on protein sequences and structures. Preprint at (2023).
Ma, M., Ren, J., Zhao, L., Testuggine, D. & Peng, X. Are multimodal transformers robust to missing modality? In 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 18156–18165 (IEEE, 2022).
Wang, H. et al. Multi-modal learning with missing modality via shared-specific feature modelling. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 15878–15887 (IEEE, 2023).
Flügel, S., Glauer, M., Mossakowski, T., & Neuhaus, F. A fuzzy loss for ontology classification. In International Conference on Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning 101–118 (Springer Nature, 2024).
Hawkins-Hooker, A., Kmec, J., Bent, O. & Duckworth, P. Likelihood-based fine-tuning of protein language models for few-shot fitness prediction and design. In ICML Workshop ML for Life ad Material Science: From Theory to Industry Applications (2024).
Vo, H. V. et al. Automatic data curation for self-supervised learning: a clustering-based approach. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. (2024).
Campanella, G., Vanderbilt, C. & Fuchs, T. Computational pathology at health system scale — self-supervised foundation models from billions of images. In AAAI 2024 Spring Symposium on Clinical Foundation Models (2024).
Chu, Y. et al. A 5’ UTR language model for decoding untranslated regions of mRNA and function predictions. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 449–460 (2024).
Google Scholar
Wei, J., Chen, S., Zong, L., Gao, X. & Li, Y. Protein–RNA interaction prediction with deep learning: structure matters. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbab540 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xia, Y., Xia, C.-Q., Pan, X. & Shen, H.-B. GraphBind: protein structural context embedded rules learned by hierarchical graph neural networks for recognizing nucleic-acid-binding residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e51 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tieng, F. Y. F. et al. A Hitchhiker’s guide to RNA–RNA structure and interaction prediction tools. Brief. Bioinform. 25, bbad421 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fang, Y., Pan, X. & Shen, H.-B. Recent deep learning methodology development for RNA–RNA interaction prediction. Symmetry 14, 1302 (2022).
Google Scholar
Zhang, H. et al. ncRNAInter: a novel strategy based on graph neural network to discover interactions between lncRNA and miRNA. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac411 (2022).
Google Scholar
Li, Y.-C. et al. DeepCMI: a graph-based model for accurate prediction of circRNA–miRNA interactions with multiple information. Brief. Funct. Genomics 23, 276–285 (2024).
Google Scholar
Rasti, S. & Vogiatzis, C. A survey of computational methods in protein–protein interaction networks. Ann. Oper. Res. 276, 35–87 (2019).
Google Scholar
Hu, L., Wang, X., Huang, Y.-A., Hu, P. & You, Z.-H. A survey on computational models for predicting protein–protein interactions. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbab036 (2021).
Google Scholar
Xu, M. et al. Graph neural networks for protein-protein interactions — a short survey. Preprint at (2024).
Gao, Z. et al. Hierarchical graph learning for protein–protein interaction. Nat. Commun. 14, 1093 (2023).
Google Scholar
Huang, K., Xiao, C., Glass, L. M., Zitnik, M. & Sun, J. SkipGNN: predicting molecular interactions with skip-graph networks. Sci. Rep. 10, 21092 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jha, K., Saha, S. & Singh, H. Prediction of protein-protein interaction using graph neural networks. Sci. Rep. 12, 8360 (2022).
Google Scholar
Nambiar, A. et al. Transforming the language of life: transformer neural networks for protein prediction tasks. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Health Informatics (2020).
Wang, Y. et al. RPI-GGCN: prediction of RNA–protein interaction based on interpretability gated graph convolution neural network and co-regularized variational autoencoders. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 36, 7681–7695 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yu, B. et al. RPI-MDLStack: predicting RNA–protein interactions through deep learning with stacking strategy and LASSO. Appl. Soft Comput. 120, 108676 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. RPI-CapsuleGAN: predicting RNA–protein interactions through an interpretable generative adversarial capsule network. Pattern Recognit. 141, 109626 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Wang, X., Niu, R., Shang, X. & Wen, J. Predicting circRNA–miRNA interactions utilizing transformer-based RNA sequential learning and high-order proximity preserved embedding. iScience 27, 108592 (2024).
Google Scholar
Singh, R., Xu, J. & Berger, B. Struct2net: Integrating structure into protein-protein interaction prediction. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2006, 403–414 (2006).
Yang, F., Fan, K., Song, D. & Lin, H. Graph-based prediction of protein–protein interactions with attributed signed graph embedding. BMC Bioinformatics 21, 323 (2020).
Google Scholar
Yan, Z., Hamilton, W. L. & Blanchette, M. Graph neural representational learning of RNA secondary structures for predicting RNA–protein interactions. Bioinformatics 36, i276–i284 (2020).
Google Scholar
Huang, Y.-A. et al. Predicting lncRNA–miRNA interaction via graph convolution auto-encoder. Front. Genet. 10, 758 (2019).
Google Scholar
Zhao, C. et al. Graph embedding ensemble methods based on the heterogeneous network for lncRNA–miRNA interaction prediction. BMC Genomics 21, 867 (2020).
Google Scholar
Dutta, P. & Saha, S. Amalgamation of protein sequence, structure and textual information for improving protein–protein interaction identification. In Proc. 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (eds Jurafsky, D., et al.) 6396–6407 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020).
Luo, X., Wang, L., Hu, P. & Hu, L. Predicting protein–protein interactions using sequence and network information via variational graph autoencoder. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 20, 3182–3194 (2023).
Google Scholar
Chen, L. et al. Graph optimal transport for cross-domain alignment. ICML 1542–1553 (2020).
Bing, R. et al. Heterogeneous graph neural networks analysis: a survey of techniques, evaluations and applications. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 8003–8042 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, D. et al. RNA–protein interaction prediction based on deep learning: a comprehensive survey. Preprint at (2024).
Ying, R., Bourgeois, D., You, J., Zitnik, M. & Leskovec, J. GNNExplainer: generating explanations for graph neural networks. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 32, 9240–9251 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lv, G., Hu, Z., Bi, Y. & Zhang, S. Learning unknown from correlations: graph neural network for inter-novel-protein interaction prediction. in Proc. Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-21 (ed. Zhou, Z.-H.) 3677–3683 (International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2021).
Li, J. et al. Evaluating graph neural networks for link prediction: current pitfalls and new benchmarking. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 (eds Oh, A. et al) 3853–3866 (NeurIPS, 2023).
Morris, C. et al. Position: future directions in the theory of graph machine learning. in Proc. 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Salakhutdinov, R. et al.) Vol. 235, 36294–36307 (PMLR, 2024).
Zhang, B. et al. The expressive power of graph neural networks: a survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 37, 1455–1474 (2025).
Google Scholar
Papamarkou, T. et al. Position: topological deep learning is the new frontier for relational learning. in Proc. 41st International Conference on Machine Learning (eds Salakhutdinov, R. et al.) Vol. 235, 39529–39555 (PMLR, 2024).
Zheng, X. et al. Graph neural networks for graphs with heterophily: a survey. Preprint at (2022).
Chen, F., Cocaign-Bousquet, M., Girbal, L. & Nouaille, S. 5′UTR sequences influence protein levels in Escherichia coli by regulating translation initiation and mRNA stability. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1088941 (2022).
Google Scholar
Lytle, J. R., Yario, T. A. & Steitz, J. A. Target mRNAs are repressed as efficiently by microRNA-binding sites in the 5′ UTR as in the 3′ UTR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 9667–9672 (2007).
Google Scholar
Zhu, H. et al. Dynamic characterization and interpretation for protein–RNA interactions across diverse cellular conditions using HDRNet. Nat. Commun. 14, 6824 (2023).
Google Scholar
Li, M. M. et al. Contextual AI models for single-cell protein biology. Nat. Methods 21, 1546–1557 (2024).
Google Scholar
Blakes, A. J. M. et al. A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 genomes project. Genome Med. 14, 1–11 (2022).
Google Scholar
Farh, K. K.-H. et al. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 518, 337–343 (2014).
Google Scholar
Whiffin, N. et al. Characterising the loss-of-function impact of 5′ untranslated region variants in 15,708 individuals. Nat. Commun. 11, 2523 (2020).
Google Scholar
Finucane, H. K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hindorff, L. A. et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9362–9367 (2009).
Google Scholar
GTEx Consortium et al. Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature 550, 204–213 (2017).
Google Scholar
Hormozdiari, F. et al. Colocalization of GWAS and eQTL signals detects target genes. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 1245–1260 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cui, Y. et al. Alternative polyadenylation transcriptome-wide association study identifies APA-linked susceptibility genes in brain disorders. Nat. Commun. 14, 583 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mai, J., Lu, M., Gao, Q., Zeng, J. & Xiao, J. Transcriptome-wide association studies: recent advances in methods, applications and available databases. Commun. Biol. 6, 899 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhernakova, D. V. et al. Identification of context-dependent expression quantitative trait loci in whole blood. Nat. Genet. 49, 139–145 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fu, X.-D. & Ares, M. Jr Context-dependent control of alternative splicing by RNA-binding proteins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 689–701 (2014).
Google Scholar
Alipanahi, B., Delong, A., Weirauch, M. T. & Frey, B. J. Predicting the sequence specificities of DNA- and RNA-binding proteins by deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 831–838 (2015).
Google Scholar
Grønning, A. G. B. et al. DeepCLIP: predicting the effect of mutations on protein-RNA binding with deep learning. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 7099–7118 (2020).
Google Scholar
Liu, X., Li, Y. I. & Pritchard, J. K. Trans effects on gene expression can drive omnigenic inheritance. Cell 177, 1022–1034.e6 (2019).
Google Scholar
Cano-Gamez, E. & Trynka, G. From GWAS to function: using functional genomics to identify the mechanisms underlying complex diseases. Front. Genet. 11, 424 (2020).
Google Scholar
Klim, J. R. et al. ALS-implicated protein TDP-43 sustains levels of STMN2, a mediator of motor neuron growth and repair. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 167–179 (2019).
Google Scholar
Tyzack, G. E. et al. Widespread FUS mislocalization is a molecular hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain 142, 2572–2580 (2019).
Google Scholar
Ziff, O. J. et al. Nucleocytoplasmic mRNA redistribution accompanies RNA binding protein mislocalization in ALS motor neurons and is restored by VCP ATPase inhibition. Neuron 111, 3011–3027.e7 (2023).
Google Scholar
Wood, M. J. A., Talbot, K. & Bowerman, M. Spinal muscular atrophy: antisense oligonucleotide therapy opens the door to an integrated therapeutic landscape. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26, R151–R159 (2017).
Google Scholar
Raal, F. J. et al. Mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B synthesis inhibitor, for lowering of LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 375, 998–1006 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mercuri, E. et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 625–635 (2018).
Google Scholar
Finkel, R. S. et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1723–1732 (2017).
Google Scholar
Mendell, J. R. et al. Eteplirsen for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann. Neurol. 74, 637–647 (2013).
Google Scholar
Benson, M. D. et al. Inotersen treatment for patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 22–31 (2018).
Google Scholar
Frank, D. E. et al. Increased dystrophin production with golodirsen in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology 94, e2270–e2282 (2020).
Google Scholar
Witztum, J. L. et al. Volanesorsen and triglyceride levels in familial chylomicronemia syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 531–542 (2019).
Google Scholar
Adams, D. et al. Patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic, for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 11–21 (2018).
Google Scholar
Balwani, M. et al. Phase 3 trial of RNAi therapeutic givosiran for acute intermittent porphyria. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 2289–2301 (2020).
Google Scholar
Garrelfs, S. F. et al. Lumasiran, an RNAi therapeutic for primary hyperoxaluria type 1. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1216–1226 (2021).
Google Scholar
Ray, K. K. et al. Two phase 3 trials of inclisiran in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 1507–1519 (2020).
Google Scholar
Clemens, P. R. et al. Long-term functional efficacy and safety of viltolarsen in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 9, 493–501 (2022).
Google Scholar
Wagner, K. R. et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of casimersen in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy amenable to exon 45 skipping: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration trial. Muscle Nerve 64, 285–292 (2021).
Google Scholar
Liu, A. et al. Nedosiran, a candidate siRNA drug for the treatment of primary hyperoxaluria: design, development, and clinical studies. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 5, 1007–1016 (2022).
Google Scholar
Miller, T. M. et al. Trial of antisense oligonucleotide tofersen for ALS. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 1099–1110 (2022).
Google Scholar
van Roon-Mom, W., Ferguson, C. & Aartsma-Rus, A. From failure to meet the clinical endpoint to US food and drug administration approval: 15th antisense oligonucleotide therapy approved qalsody (tofersen) for treatment of SOD1 mutated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nucleic Acid. Ther. 33, 234–237 (2023).
Google Scholar
Korobeynikov, V. A., Lyashchenko, A. K., Blanco-Redondo, B., Jafar-Nejad, P. & Shneider, N. A. Antisense oligonucleotide silencing of FUS expression as a therapeutic approach in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat. Med. 28, 104–116 (2022).
Google Scholar
Musa, D. A., Raji, M. O., Sikiru, A. B., Aremu, K. H. & Aigboeghian, E. A. Promising RNA-based therapies for viral infections, genetic disorders and cancer. Acad. Mol. Biol. Genomics (2024).
Wang, Q. et al. Cell cycle regulation by alternative polyadenylation of CCND1. Sci. Rep. 8, 6824 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ng, K. P. et al. A common BIM deletion polymorphism mediates intrinsic resistance and inferior responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer. Nat. Med. 18, 521–528 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sotillo, E. et al. Convergence of acquired mutations and alternative splicing of CD19 enables resistance to CART-19 immunotherapy. Cancer Discov. 5, 1282–1295 (2015).
Google Scholar
Sobczak, K. & Krzyzosiak, W. J. Structural determinants of BRCA1 translational regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17349–17358 (2002).
Google Scholar
Mayr, C. & Bartel, D. P. Widespread shortening of 3′UTRs by alternative cleavage and polyadenylation activates oncogenes in cancer cells. Cell 138, 673–684 (2009).
Google Scholar
Mitschka, S. & Mayr, C. Context-specific regulation and function of mRNA alternative polyadenylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 779–796 (2022).
Google Scholar
Liang, X.-H. et al. Translation efficiency of mRNAs is increased by antisense oligonucleotides targeting upstream open reading frames. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 875–880 (2016).
Google Scholar
Liang, X.-H. et al. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting translation inhibitory elements in 5′ UTRs can selectively increase protein levels. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 9528–9546 (2017).
Google Scholar
Zhao, Y., Oono, K., Takizawa, H. & Kotera, M. GenerRNA: a generative pre-trained language model for de novo RNA design. PLoS ONE 19, e0310814 (2024).
Google Scholar
Holdt, L. M., Kohlmaier, A. & Teupser, D. Circular RNAs as therapeutic agents and targets. Front. Physiol. 9, 1262 (2018).
Google Scholar
Touznik, A., Maruyama, R., Hosoki, K., Echigoya, Y. & Yokota, T. LNA/DNA mixmer-based antisense oligonucleotides correct alternative splicing of the SMN2 gene and restore SMN protein expression in type 1 SMA fibroblasts. Sci. Rep. 7, 3672 (2017).
Google Scholar
Roux, B. T., Lindsay, M. A. & Heward, J. A. Knockdown of nuclear-located enhancer RNAs and long ncRNAs using locked nucleic acid GapmeRs. Methods Mol. Biol. 1468, 11–18 (2017).
Google Scholar
Amodio, N. et al. Drugging the lncRNA MALAT1 via LNA gapmeR ASO inhibits gene expression of proteasome subunits and triggers anti-multiple myeloma activity. Leukemia 32, 1948–1957 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chen, R. et al. Engineering circular RNA for enhanced protein production. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 262–272 (2023).
Google Scholar
Zhang, G. et al. KGANSynergy: knowledge graph attention network for drug synergy prediction. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad167 (2023).
Google Scholar
Vignac, C. et al. DiGress: discrete denoising diffusion for graph generation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR, 2023).
Zheng, S. et al. Predicting equilibrium distributions for molecular systems with deep learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 558–567 (2024).
Google Scholar
Nguyen, E. et al. Sequence modelling and design from molecular to genome scale with Evo. Science 386, eado9336 (2024).
Google Scholar
Atz, K. et al. Prospective de novo drug design with deep interactome learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 1–18 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cacciarelli, D. & Kulahci, M. Active learning for data streams: a survey. Mach. Learn. (2023).
Fournier, Q. et al. Protein language models: is scaling necessary? Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Outeiral, C. & Deane, C. M. Codon language embeddings provide strong signals for use in protein engineering. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 170–179 (2024).
Google Scholar
Naghipourfar, M. et al. A suite of foundation models captures the contextual interplay between codons. Preprint at bioRxiv (2024).
Celaj, A. et al. An RNA foundation model enables discovery of disease mechanisms and candidate therapeutics. Preprint at bioRxiv (2023).
Ren, Z. et al. CodonBERT: a BERT-based architecture tailored for codon optimization using the cross-attention mechanism. Bioinformatics 40, btae330 (2024).
Google Scholar
Boccaletto, P. et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D303–D307 (2018).
Google Scholar
Varani, L. et al. The NMR structure of the 38 kDa U1A protein–PIE RNA complex reveals the basis of cooperativity in regulation of polyadenylation by human U1A protein. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 329–335 (2000).
Google Scholar
Hennig, J. et al. Structural basis for the assembly of the Sxl–Unr translation regulatory complex. Nature 515, 287–290 (2014).
Google Scholar
Chen, S.-J. RNA folding: conformational statistics, folding kinetics, and ion electrostatics. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 37, 197–214 (2008).
Google Scholar
Halvorsen, M., Martin, J. S., Broadaway, S. & Laederach, A. Disease-associated mutations that alter the RNA structural ensemble. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001074 (2010).
Google Scholar
Mortimer, S. A. & Weeks, K. M. Time-resolved RNA SHAPE chemistry: quantitative RNA structure analysis in one-second snapshots and at single-nucleotide resolution. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1413–1421 (2009).
Google Scholar
Griffiths-Jones, S., Bateman, A., Marshall, M., Khanna, A. & Eddy, S. R. Rfam: an RNA family database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 439–441 (2003).
Google Scholar
Kalvari, I. et al. Rfam 14: expanded coverage of metagenomic, viral and microRNA families. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D192–D200 (2021).
Google Scholar
RNAcentral Consortium RNAcentral 2021: secondary structure integration, improved sequence search and new member databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D212–D220 (2021).
Google Scholar
Harrison, P. W. et al. Ensembl 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D891–D899 (2024).
Google Scholar
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D29–D38 (2023).
Google Scholar
Kenton, J. D. M.-W. & Chang, L. K. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 1, 4171–4186 (2019).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein–protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D638–D646 (2023).
Google Scholar
Celledoni, E. et al. Structure-preserving deep learning. Eur. J. Appl. Math. 32, 888–936 (2021).
Google Scholar
Lai, P., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., Fu, F. & Cui, B. Enhancing unsupervised sentence embeddings via knowledge-driven data augmentation and Gaussian-decayed contrastive learning. Preprint at (2024).
Glauer, M., Neuhaus, F., Mossakowski, T. & Hastings, J. Ontology pre-training for poison prediction. In German Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Künstliche Intelligenz) 31–45 (Springer Nature, 2023).
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. & Karniadakis, G. E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686–707 (2019).
Google Scholar
Elmarakeby, H. A. et al. Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery. Nature 598, 348–352 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., Cohen, T. & Veličković, P. Geometric deep learning: grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. Preprint at (2021).
Wu, Z. et al. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 32, 4–24 (2021).
Google Scholar
Chami, I., Abu-El-Haija, S., Perozzi, B., Ré, C. & Murphy, K. Machine learning on graphs: a model and comprehensive taxonomy. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 23, 1–64 (2022).
Müller, L., Galkin, M., Morris, C. & Rampášek, L. Attending to graph transformers. Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. 2835–8856 (2024).
Kipf, T. N. & Welling, M. Variational graph auto-encoders. In NIPS Workshop on Bayesian Deep Learning (2016).
Yang, Z. et al. Understanding negative sampling in graph representation learning. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1666–1676 (ACM, 2020).
link